Πανεπιστημιακά Φροντιστήρια ΠΑΠΑΪΩΑΝΝΟΥ - 3is Septemvriou 91

Do not trust them for any reason! These are people who are only interested in the tuition they receive. I will agree on the fiasco in the T.T.E. For a number of months they gave misspelled and in the wrong notes. The material they covered was clear at the personal discretion of each teacher. So since they support the huge success they have let them post the percentage of successful, something they will not do as it is zero. An apology to the students may have shown that they have a little dignity, but these are extremely immoral people and huge liars. Eat the money from the tuition and I hope people see the reviews and be the last to get them because you deserve it. Shame on you!

Seabird's critique is a desperate attempt by the tutorial to cover the huge fiasco regarding the preparation for the T.T.E. I totally agree with the negative reviews as I do not find any exaggeration in them. For anyone interested, I have kept all the exams as well as the notes of the repetitive courses in order to compare them with the topics of the competition and can send me an e-mail to verify it. The tutorial not only fell completely out providing infamous preparation, but also disoriented and upset students up to a week before with non-material things. Do not waste your money as the only good thing about this place was the cake. We are talking about a man who criticized and went to the highest paid job in the public sector and mentioned the cake and that his / her mother had prepared in the specific tutorial and passed. This alone shows the confusion in the minds of the owners who made the criticism as well as their cowardice in mentioning the names of students who passed the competition as no one passed ... other well-known tutoring centers made the names public. Immoral, irrelevant and influenced, the owners walk relentlessly towards destruction. DO NOT believe them ..

I attended the courses for the Competition of T. AMAZING PREPARATION. A big thank you to the teachers. I am among the successful (in high order). Without having a background in economics, I managed to learn Accounting and Economics from the beginning. This is mainly due to the teachers and the tutoring support material they gave us which was much better than I expected. Following the instructions and the competitions of the tutorial and of course with a lot of reading I managed to write so well. The incredible thing is that many of the questions they asked us in the repetitive lessons were very targeted and close to the topics. From there, the words of my mother were confirmed, who convinced me to go there because she herself had been appointed preparing at the same tutoring center many years ago. Professor Sotiris in Mathematics is one way and relieved us of our anxiety. Overall the teachers are all good and it seemed to be of the place but the notes were what made the difference for me. Especially for me who did not know accounting, it gave me the basics I needed and emphasized the key points without getting lost. ‘Anyone who wants to enter a competition should know that they have to devote a lot of personal time to reading (especially me who was working at the same time), but there is a reward for that. Finally, in order not to spread, I recommend it because in general the atmosphere throughout the tutorial was very friendly (up to family, try the cake and you will understand what I mean).

I attended the preparation for the tender of the Bank of Greece. I rate with 1 star for 2 reasons. Firstly because the teachers who prepared us well were in Algebra and Statistics. In the indefinite matter of language skills we had a good preparation. In the beginning of economic theory they fell completely out as their tests had questions that none of them dropped, not even close ones. They even loaded us with too many things out of matter, resulting in wasting valuable time. As far as accounting is concerned, I remember characteristics that the teacher used to tell us "what to do with the book? Do you have the cape" (she meant the accounting booklets, as they numbered K1, K2, K3, K4). Later, of course, he told us to read from the book as well. But honestly nothing fell out of the huge amount of material we learned. We wasted our time simply copying from the board huge exercises that were of no use in the exams. Finally, I would like to add that he has not published successful ones because he simply did not go through this tutorial. ΥΓ. The second reason I put a star is that I do not have to put a zero.

Tragic. I had registered in the psychology classification department of EKPA and, while the classes started in two days (March 11), I had not received any information. I got a call and they told me we did not have time to inform you, the lessons will start on April 1 because the teacher stuck a crown. March 24, while again I had not received any information, I sent an email and they called me to tell me that the classes will start on JUNE 3 because the teachers have seminars. Obviously the participation was small and that is why they constantly postponed it.

Unacceptable tutorial. We had agreed to attend 1 university course as a group and some individually. Obviously because no people gathered, the lesson never took place but the worst thing is that they did not inform me. Apart from that, I called them several times to find out what would happen to the lessons and they just didn't care, each time they asked me the same things and they told me the same things. Just the worst tutorial

I attended classes for the fire department competition and of course I failed !!! The teachers simply wrote down on the board without documenting and following a specific series of material. It was a mess. Only the Law course had a teacher who explained to us and followed, in my opinion, the material correctly and the only course I understood even though, imagine that it was not even in my subject matter. Do not waste your money!